The newspaper article provided here was included in a newpaper called The
and published February 1986 in Washington, D.C. It was delivered
to every member of the U.S. House of Representatives
and every member
of the United States Senate. Not one representative, senator or staff assistant
was motiviated sufficiently to investigate further.
The newspaper was also provided free to the George Washington University Medical
School students and professors. Again, not one was motivated to investigate
All while 7,000 to 10,000 Americans died weekly from cancer!
Good examples of public irresponsibility from people in positions of public
trust or professions with public trust implied! Shame!
Barry Lynes September 25, 1999
"The Cancer Cure That Worked: The Rife Report" was published
in April 1987, 14 months after the U.S. Congress turned its back on Rife
and ignored an incredible opportunity to "jump start" the Rife
The cure for cancer was covered up. Treatment suppressed since 1930s
(Reprinted with permission from Barry Lynes)
It has been a secret for many years - more than 50 years in fact.
It is a secret that is a shame of the medical profession and another example
of complacent press, another example of a scientific conspiracy that resembles
more a medieval guild protecting its financial interests than a profession
dedicated to public service, and another example of a political system afraid
to promote the public good when it clashed with powerful elites.
This story also demonstrates how apathetic, asleep, cowardly and unwilling
so many individuals, especially the self-righteous "new agers,"
actually are when given the opportunity to take real initiatives which could
rectify monstrous wrongs.
The secret is the cancer cure.
Before detailing this fundamental wrong, it is important to emphasize what
years of covering up a cancer cure has meant in terms of suffering.
Almost every family in America has been touched by the horror of lingering
deaths by cancer. Those who haven't been directly affected have known neighbors
and friends who have been the victims of both the disease and the arrogant
scientists, government bureaucrats and financial elites who are responsible.
Children have been among the many millions who have not only been abandoned
to cancer's excruciating pain and protracted terror, but to existing, stupid,
torturous, experimental procedures which don't work. In a word, the American
medical and political "establishment" are guilty of gross misconduct.
Our nation is premised upon democratic procedures, checks and balances, competition,
and the correction of abuses through open discussion which lead to institutional
change. In the matter of this 50
year old cancer cure, all of the above
have not worked. The cancer cure was suppressed. Agencies, both public and
private, were not responsive. The cost in human lives and wasted resources
has been staggering. A Vietnam War, the countless annual deaths in automobile
accidents, or' the lives prematurely ended because of inferior nutrution caused
by poverty together cannot match the number who have died horribly because
America's culture could not expose and then break the vested interests which
perpetrated this crime. And if Colorado Governor Lamm's figures are correct,
of Americans now living will die of cancer in the future.
Americans tion of committed scientitst, and to promote the needed public education.
So perhaps finally - if enough of us insist on it - America's institutional
ability to correct this outrage can be demonstrated. But don't hold your breath.
Without a major, on-going, public commitment and a national authority to oversee
the effort and report regularly on the progress being made, it is unlikely
that swift, significant remedies will occur.
In another article in this issue (The Timid Press,
Page 1), syndicated
columnist Mary McGrory's acceptance speech upon receiving the Lovejoy journalism
award is reported. In that talk, Ms. McGrory advocated that readers read their
papers "with the idea of doing something." In a similar vein, the
article on the changing weather and the scientific cover up involved, science
philosopher Paul Feyerabend is quoted when he calls for "duly elected
committees of laymen" to judge the efforts and recommendations of scientists.
Certainly, if anything deserves both the individual reader's commitment as
well as participation in oversight committees, it is the investigation into
this cancer cure and the development of procedures to bring this cancer cure
into practical use as fast as possible.
This story is somewhat technical, but the complicated scientific details will
be omitted in order that you, the reader, can grasp the essentials. The specifics
can be checked elsewhere and it is hoped that enough of you --including experts
capable of initiating action will do so. A mobilization is required, for not
and many other diseases threatening us
are potentially capable of being eradicated if we, the people of the United
States, get off our collective asses.
In the 1920s a scientist-inventor named Royal Raymond Rife invented a new
kind of microscope. In an article New Age Journal
March produced little
readers), the story of Rife's cancer cure was detailed. Since
then, Rife has been nominated for the "Alternative Nobel Prize"
which is annually awarded in Europe as a protest to the more established,
less risk taking Swedish honor. Yet, little notice of Rife and his miraculous
discovery has infiltrated the establishment consciousness.
Rife's microscope was a stunning advance. Unlike the electron microscope,
Rife's microscope made it possible to study "living" bacteria,
, and so forth. An electron microscope kills its specimens. Rife's
remarkable breakthrough used a new approach to bend light. As a result, Rife
was able to prove that bacteria could change their form. In effect, they could
become cancer causing viruses.
Rife then implanted his cancer-causing bacteria into rats. Tumors subsequently
developed. From here, Rife made the startling discovery that the bacteria
could change into a completely different form
if the "medium on which
they were living" was slightly altered. In other words, Rife's cancer
causing substance was, in some forms and in association with some environments
within the body, deadly. But in other forms and in other environments, benign.
His cancer causing substance could be changed back and forth from one to the
other. The implications of this discovery are obvious. Cancer cells might
be transformed to healthy cells again
Rife then began beaming different frequencies of light on these microorganisms.
Up until the early 1950s,
Rife perfected this method. As Christopher
Bird reported in the New Age
article, "many lethal those of tuberculosis,
typhoid, leprosy... appeared to disintegrate or 'bIow up' in the field of
his microscope." This "death ray" was applied to cancers in
rats. It worked!
The next step was humans. The result? Here is Rife's report: "The first
clinical work on cancer was completed under the supervision of Milbank Johnson,
M.D., which was setup under a special medical research committee of the University
of Southern California. Sixteen cases were treated at the clinic for manv
tvpes of malignancy. After three months, fourteen of these so-called hopeless
cases were signed off as clinically cured by a staff of medical doctors and
Alvin G. Foord, M. D., pathologist for the group.
Throughout the 1930's, Rife and associates continued their work. In 1940,
Arthur W. Yale, M.D. reported that Rife's discoveries were an entirely new
theory of the origin and cause of cancer, and the treatment and results have
been so unique and unbelievable" that we may be able to "eliminate
the second largest cause of deaths in the United States."
But it was not to be!
There were powerful doctors whose careers were based on the theory that bacteria
could not change its form. Rife's discovery threatened their status and their
own research. (It was like the invention of the automobile for a horse-drawn
One of these "authorities" was Dr. Thomas Rivers of the Rockefeller
Institute. Another was Harvard microbiologist Dr. Hans Zinsser. The cancer
cure was killed by the powerful.
One of Rife's supporters, Dr. Edward C. Rosenow, a pioneer bacteriologist,
sadly commented at the end of his life, "They simply won't listen."
Others have followed Rife and have confirmed different aspects of his theory
but since they are few in number and are promoting a cause contrary to the
medical establishment's approved philosophy, they are not supported. Even
publishing their findings is difficult if not impossible because of the dominant
medical orthodoxy which has reigned since the 1930s!
Christopher Bird's 1976' New Age Journal article
summation of the political
coverup as perceived by the Lee Foundation
of Nutritional Research in Milwaukee. According to Bird, the Lee Foundation
"maintains that Rife, his microscope and his life work were tabooed by
Ieaders in the U.S. medical profession and that any medical doctor who made
use of his practical discoveries was stripped of his privileges as a member
of the local medical society."
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) still bans treatments similar to those
And how many millions of dollars are annually "invested" in the
establishment's preferred quackery and toururous gimmicks?
Those interested in pursuing this matter, which as a first step means forming
a national committee of scientists, administrators, "can-do-types"
and laymen to monitor and correct
this crime are encouraged to contact
Perhaps citizen action is not entirely dead in this country
Or have we truly lost our nerve, our fighting spirit, and our 1776 contempt
for aristocracy assuming dictatorial rights over our bodies and minds?